Freedom of Information, Request #2 – DETINI – The appeal.

Today I appealed against the DETI NI’s refusal to grant my FOI request for details of the BT 100% broadband contract.

Here is the content of the appeal:


Subject: Appeal against decision on FOl 062

Dear Trevor,

Thank you for your letter of 2 November 2005.  It has been a number of
years since we last spoke. I hope all is well with you.

I write to appeal your decision to withhold full responses on questions 1
and 3 of my request. Please understand this email as an official request for
an Internal Review of your decision.

I do not believe that DETINI decision to withhold is either within the
letter nor the spirit of the Law (FOI Act 2000).

Further, Information Commissioner guidance on the law which has been available
to Public bodies for some time (well before your signing of the March 2004
contract with BT) specifically on confidentiality clauses as also been
ignored.
A blanket confidentiality clause does not absolve the department of
its statutory obligations and the Information Commissioner has stated
in the guidance that he would look unfavourably on such blanket clauses.

You should also be aware that general confidentiality and the excuse of
"likely to prejudice BT’s commercial interests" may not apply for companies
who are regarded as a Monopoly.  BT has the country’s largest recognised
monopoly.  The Information Commissioner has also stated this consideration
in the published Awareness Guidelines.
I do not believe that BT, as a monopoly, can possibly be commercially
damaged by the release of any information.

Finally, I do not see any evidence of the Public Interest Test which I
believe you are obligated to complete.  This information has undoubted
public interest.  The department has spent tax payers money on a contract
with BT.  I quote from your department’s own press release:
"This vitally important contract will deliver the Government’s broadband
vision of a fully connected Northern Ireland. In turn it will help
make Northern Ireland more competitive." – Ian Pearson, MP
"This will ensure that Northern Ireland is a seriously attractive area
for existing company expansion and new inward investment." – Bill Murphy, BT
"Broadband access to all rural areas will be a tremendous boost. Many rural
communities have already been campaigning to bring Broadband to their
locality. This demonstrates the demand for the service and having it
available to every household in Northern Ireland will ensure that a
rural /urban divide does not open up." – John Gilliland, UFU
  http://www.detini.gov.uk/cgi-bin/morenews?utilid=433

The department itself recognises this contract of vital importance to
the Northern Ireland economy.

Finally, I note that the department has not yet updated the PDF document
on how to make a FOI request to include the correct email address. I was
assured at the time that this would be taken care of immediately (during
a telephone call from Ian Boyd).
http://www.detini.gov.uk/cgi-bin/downutildoc?id=853

I am also concerned that during the phone call from Ian Boyd that he seemed
to want to know, a) who I was, b) was I a competitor to BT, and  c) to
what purpose I wanted the information.  None of this information is relevant
to any FOI request. To Ian’s credit he did correct himself and said that
it should not matter, however – he should not have asked.  For the record –
I am not in competition with BT or even in the Internet industry any longer
and have not been for a number of years.

Thank you.

Paul Gregg

To await the response.

2 Replies to “Freedom of Information, Request #2 – DETINI – The appeal.”

  1. This is very interesting indeed. Since I did not research DETNI before my previous reply I was unaware of what they were, now I am, I am confident you could persue this to the highest level and force a release of the information you are requesting. Keep us posted!

  2. Since DETI NI said they had no record of my original email and had nothing from their logs I’m pasting this mail delivery log here just to show their systems received it.


    2005-11-09 16:28:39.792825500 starting delivery 339789: msg 847926 to remote tre
    vor.forsythe@detini.gov.uk
    2005-11-09 16:28:39.792828500 status: local 1/3 remote 3/20
    2005-11-09 16:28:39.792830500 starting delivery 339790: msg 847926 to remote foi
    @detini.gov.uk
    2005-11-09 16:28:39.792833500 status: local 1/3 remote 4/20
    2005-11-09 16:28:39.792835500 starting delivery 339791: msg 847926 to remote ian
    .boyd@detini.gov.uk
    2005-11-09 16:28:39.792838500 status: local 1/3 remote 5/20
    2005-11-09 16:28:39.792854500 starting delivery 339792: msg 847926 to remote Alb
    erta.pauley@detini.gov.uk
    2005-11-09 16:28:39.792857500 status: local 1/3 remote 6/20
    2005-11-09 16:28:42.398670500 delivery 339789: success: 145.229.156.65_accepted_
    message./Remote_host_said:_250_LINDA:_Message_accepted_for_delivery/
    2005-11-09 16:28:42.398848500 status: local 1/3 remote 5/20
    2005-11-09 16:28:42.399544500 delivery 339790: success: 145.229.156.65_accepted_
    message./Remote_host_said:_250_LINDA:_Message_accepted_for_delivery/
    2005-11-09 16:28:42.399700500 status: local 1/3 remote 4/20
    2005-11-09 16:28:42.614311500 delivery 339791: success: 145.229.156.65_accepted_
    message./Remote_host_said:_250_LINDA:_Message_accepted_for_delivery/
    2005-11-09 16:28:42.614478500 status: local 1/3 remote 3/20
    2005-11-09 16:28:42.615562500 delivery 339792: success: 145.229.156.65_accepted_
    message./Remote_host_said:_250_LINDA:_Message_accepted_for_delivery/

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.