Wow, I love this card.
New benchmark of system from previous post with this card:
This weekend I built my new PC. All the parts arrived, eventually. Case, not shown, is a Corsair Obsidian 550D – supposedly a mid-sized tower, but in reality it’s huge.
|Desc||Make||Model||Link to product||Store|
|Case||Corsair||Corsair Obsidian Series 550D CC-9011015-WW Quiet Mid-Tower Cases||http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B006L6ZSWC||Amazon|
|Motherboard||Asus||ROG Maximus VII Hero||http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00K8MUTMO||Amazon|
|CPU||Intel||Intel Devil’s Canyon Core i7 i7-4790K CPU (Quad Core 4GHz, Socket H3 LGA-1150)||http://www.ebuyer.com/645546-intel-core-i7-4790k-4ghz-socket-1150-8mb-l3-cache-retail-boxed-bx80646i74790k||Ebuyer|
|CPU Cooler||Corsair||Corsair CW-9060014-WW Hydro Series H110 280mm Rad Extreme Performance All-In-One Liquid CPU Cooler||http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00B4OCW7K||Amazon|
|RAM||GSkill||G Skill 4x 8GB PC3-19200 DDR3 2400MHz Gaming Memory Kit||http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B007V9PFTO||Amazon|
|HD||Samsung||Samsung 840 EVO 500GB 2.5-inch Basic SATA Solid State Drive||http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00E3W19MO||Amazon|
|Front Panel||Asus||Asus 4 inch USB 2.0 ROG Front Base LCD Dual Bay Gaming Panel||http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00INSNP4E||Amazon|
Basically, this is a beast. No graphics card yet because nVidia is announcing the 900 series in less than a week. Current gen cards will drop significantly. I’ll look at the new cards and performance/price when they are announced. Until then, I’ll live with the onboard Intel HD (which sill kills my present machine’s GeForce 9200).
Onto the build.
People talk about “push” and “pull” systems and say the most efficient way to cool the CPU is to “pull” cold air from the outside of the case. It might be more efficient for the CPU, but all that heat is then dumped into the case. I feel better with a push to put the heat outside.
There is a cage you need to build for the waterblock/pump – a little fiddly and the instructions need careful attention. I got it wrong the first time, turns out I just needed to rotate the screw mounting cuffs. Cage constructed:
I didn’t know what way the fans blew, so took a guess and fitted them to the case. One thing here – I thought the screws were a little too short for the washer + rubber case mounting + fan size to reach the radiator casing it screws into. I had to apply some pressure for the screws to bite. Then I could tighten them… little did I know I’d be doing this several times later in the day… And here is why:
The radiator block extends over the top of the motherboard, enough to obstruct the EATX12V supply (direct power supply to the CPU). This is an 8 pin (4×2) block, the radiator blocks 4 top pins. The last time I built a PC, this didn’t exist and so my pre-purchase check that the AXT powersupply plug on the motherboard was far enough away didn’t throw up any red flags. I had a real problem. Case (Corsair Obsidian 550D) + Watercooler (Corsair H110) were listed as compatible by Corsair, but throw in my choice of motherboard Asus Maximus Hero VII and suddenly they are not compatible.
I don’t believe Corsair should list a case/heatsink as compatible if it is going to cover 5mm of the motherboard – especially since there are power and fan connections on most motherboards up there.
Seriously considering having to go with the retail fan on the CPU…
I then noticed that the blocking part is just part of the mounting frame, that I didn’t need on this side…. I could cut out a hole with the dremel.
Buffed it to be sure no little metal filings would be left to drop down, shorting components, and refitted it back into the case.
This time, I should be able to fit the motherboard and have clearance for the power plug. Because the CPU and Fan powersupply would also be blocked, I plugged the cables in before sliding the motherboard into position.
Few screws later, and we’re in:
Fitted the powersupply, and because I was pleased with myself over the motherboard/radiator fiasco, completely forgot to take pictures of it.
SSD was another issue. Screwed it into one of the drive trays and then found I couldn’t plug in the right-angled power cables.
Looks like I’m resorting to velcro (or rather 3M Picture hanging tape). These strips are very useful: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Command-Picture-Hanging-Strips-17202/dp/B00016ZLDY
RAM added, all 32GB of it and powered on…. It glows!
Front Base fitted and covers on. Had to remove the front door from the case as it wouldn’t close with the knob on the Front Base.
Front Base while idle:
So how does it perform?
Ran Prime95 to stress the CPU… Hello heat.
Passmark score – not bad. In a few weeks with a decent graphics card, scores will be great.
I’ve decided to build myself a new computer. I haven’t done this in about 10 years, so there was a fair amount of reading and research to understand all the latest components, processors, chipsets, and compatible RAM.
Because this is likely going to have to last me a while, I wanted to go big. Very big. More on that in the next article as I intend on documenting the build.
I also wanted to buy all of the components from Amazon due to Amazon’s excellent customer service should anything go wrong.
On Friday 5th May 2014, I started ordering. Amazon offered me a free trial of Amazon Prime during checkout.
Excellent, I’ll get everything faster. Well that’s the theory anyway.
It is now Wednesday 10th September (evening) and I have 4 of the 6 items delivered. Everything was in stock when I placed the order. Why aren’t they here yet?
The CPU (Devil’s Canyon i7-4790K) was ordered from Ebuyer because Amazon had no stock and was saying 2-4 weeks, so I sucked up Ebuyer’s £8 delivery charge to Northern Ireland. It arrived the next day. Well done Ebuyer.
Amazon Prime, however, I don’t think will be having the trial converted to a purchase.
Registered a new domain name this evening and very quickly received what looked very much like a phishing email from domainadmin.com
The email itself:
> From: PGregg [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: 24 June 2014 23:26
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: VERIFICATION REQUIRED – Please verify your domain name(s) as soon as possible
Please read this important e-mail carefully.
Recently you registered, transferred or modified the contact information for one or more of your domain name(s). As of January 1, 2014, ICANN requires all accredited registrars to verify your new contact information.
You can read about ICANN’s new policy at: http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/approved-with-specs-27jun13-en.htm#whois-accuracy.
In order to ensure your domain name remain active, you must now click the following link and follow the instructions provided:
Failure to follow the above link and complete this process will eventually lead to the suspension of your domain name(s).
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Turns out this is actually legitimate. Posting this in case others wonder the same and google happens to direct them to this page.
I came across Ellie Mae O’Hagan on twitter today, who claims in her twitter biog to be a “Socialist, feminist, columnist”.
Her twitter ID is @MissEllieMae, and she wrote this:
I just used my lunch break to write a twitlonger on Lord McAlpine. Damn you Twitter twitlonger.com/show/k1bdr7
— Ellie Mae O’Hagan (@MissEllieMae) November 16, 2012
Feel free to go read, then come back here. I’m going to break it down and comment.
I want to expand on the tweets I put out this morning regarding Lord McAlpine’s decision to sue for damages after being falsely accused of abusing children.
Twitter is the sort of place where even the most obvious of sentiments must be spelled out, so let me emphasise that I recognise Lord McAlpine has been the victim of false accusations, that he has suffered immensely and unjustly, and I extend my sympathy to him.
I would like to respond firstly to the respondents who accused me of creating a ‘hierarchy of suffering’ in saying what I said. I want to be absolutely clear here: being abused as a child IS worse than being falsely accused of paedophilia. There is no doubt about that – especially as abuse survivors who speak out often become the victims of false accusations as well (they are called fantasists, liars, sluts etc). I invite anyone who wants to contradict me to ask themselves which form of suffering they would prefer.
How is this relevant? Are you trying to say it is ok to be called a paedophile because it isn’t as bad as being abused? Reading this paragraph – you are certainly establishing a hierarchy of suffering.
In any case, I was not trying to create a hierarchy of suffering. I was attempting to redress the hierarchy of suffering which ALREADY EXISTS thanks to the rape culture and privilege which exists in our society. These forces allowed the abuse of Stephen Messham to happen. These forces enabled the abuse to be covered up. These forces allowed the Mail to print a hatchet job of an abuse victim. And now they are responsible for the entire story focussing upon Lord McAlpine, instead of the pursuit of justice for survivors of abuse. That is not an accident. That is evidence of rape culture and privilege.
Consider your hierarchy of suffering created.
It is worrying that so many people are behaving as though it is just coincidence that McAlpine been the focus of the story for weeks, overshadowing the man who survived the actual abuse. It is worrying that so few (especially so few journalists) have acknowledged that this skewed focus is the result of OPPRESSIVE SOCIAL STRUCTURES which destroy the lives of many, and not just the way a news story happened to roll out.
Now I want to turn to McAlpine’s decision to sue for damages. This is his right as someone falsely accused, and I acknowledge that. But just because someone is entitled to do something, that doesn’t make it the best course of action. Let’s look at the context here: McAlpine has just received £185k from the BBC the day before its annual drive to raise money for vulnerable children. And for what? It is now accepted that he was falsely accused. Some have said ‘mud sticks,’ but I fail to see how £185k will make anyone desperate to believe the false allegations think ‘oh well now he’s got MONEY, I don’t believe it anymore.’
And yet, the twitterverse is now criticising McAlpine for not suing Scallywag for similar allegations in the 1990s. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Further, Scallywag was being sued by John Major, and promptly went bankrupt – so there was noone for McAlpine to sue.
As an already very wealthy individual, this money will not ease McAlpine’s suffering in the way that – say – Chris Jeffries’ compensation might. Given the issues of rape culture and privilege in these events (see above), I think it is the wrong decision for him to keep that money, despite him being entitled to do so.
That is entirely your opinion. You are entitled to it. But just as you think it is wrong of McAlpine to keep it (note, he hasn’t said if he is keeping it or donating it anyway), I am perfectly entitled to think you are wrong for your posturing, indeed bullying, in an attempted to coerce him into donating the settlement to abuse victims.
In addition, McAlpine’s solicitor has also said he is in possession of a ‘very long list’ of people who smeared his client. I can’t imagine all of these people are able to afford a legal case, and I suspect legal proceedings might mean financial ruin for some of them. How does that help Lord McAlpine? Will that be confirmation of his innocence? I don’t think it will make any difference to his reputation, but it will make a lot of difference to the lives of these people. Is it really proportionate? Again, Lord McAlpine is entitled to pursue this if he so wishes, but I don’t think that makes it right.
This is irrelevant to the dealings of the monies from settlement with the BBC. However, why not? He was libelled. He has a lawful right to seek redress in the courts. Twitter is not extralegal. Therefore what is the problem?
At this point I also want to point out that abuse survivors who sue are often accused of being in it for the money, and are told it should be about ‘justice.’ But when the accused sue, it is considered fair. A rape survivor contacted me this morning to tell me that when she claimed her compensation, she was smeared in a national newspaper as being a ‘slut.’ That’s another example of rape culture and privilege.
That is terrible – but it seems you are invoking the hierarchy of suffering to say McAlpine has no reason for complaint.
Finally, many have said it is not Lord McAlpine’s responsibility to stand up for Stephen Messham or survivors of child abuse, as he has not chosen to be a part of this story. Given sexual abuse is the product of rape culture and privilege (see above) which is a socially ingrained thing, we ALL have a responsibility when it comes to this. It is doubly incumbent upon Lord McAlpine to do this given how the story has refocused on him thanks to rape culture and privilege (see above). He may not have intended that, but it HAS happened. I would like to see him use this opportunity to call for justice. That could only improve his reputation.
Seriously? It was Stephen Messham who misidentified Lord McAlpine. Why on earth would he want to stand up for him? The story has not refocused. If it McAlpine’s fault that the media (and you) are mentally incapable of separating two stories and running with both?
So, given Lord McAlpine’s solicitor says he is monitoring Twitter, I have this message for him: please ask your client to consider using his influence to speak out for survivors and to donate his compensation to helping them. He is under no obligation to do so, but it would be right and decent under the circumstances, and it would help refocus this story onto the pursuit of justice for survivors.
It might be the decent thing to do. But it is your opinion that it is the right thing to do. What he does with the settlement is entirely up to him and not for you or others to persuade him what to do with it. Trying to sway public opinion with emotive rubbish like this is an abuse of position for any columnist. Further, it is only a settlement of this magnitude that will cause media owners to think twice before falsely accusing an individual of a crime.
Consider this. If McAlpine had been accused of being a thief, or a murderer and it turned out to be a false allegation. Would people be calling for him to donate any settlement to victims of theft or families of murder victimes? No? Why not? I stand by by original twitter comment:
. @misselliemae You probably should have had lunch instead of writing all that drivel.
— Paul Gregg (@pgregg) November 16, 2012
She will probably never read this because she declared me a troll and blocked me for having the audacity to disagree with her opinions.
My final comment is that those who dug themselves into the holes they are in regarding McAlpine should perhaps stop digging.
— Paul Gregg (@pgregg) September 8, 2012
Someone sent me a message on twitter pointing me to the URL: menshn.com/data/chat.php (which shall remain unclickable for reasons that will become apparent). This web page basically dumps the last 20-30k “menshns” out in a semi-structured html data format. In total (at time of writing) it dumps 31MB of data. So you can see why I’m not making it a link. I’ve no desire to overload their systems.
Upon looking at the “View source” on the menshn.com homepage, it seems that they use this to back end the automatically updating feed on their homepage.
If you watch the traffic generated by your browser – you can see it making a request every 4 seconds for https://menshn.com/data/chat.php?roomid=*&lastid=73405
So, now we know where my source got the link from – seems if you don’t supply any arguments, it just dumps everything it has. And so, with such a dataset we are able to do some metrics.
First up, I parsed all the data out to produce a simple ID,Room,Name,Message text file – just to prove to myself that I had understood the data set and was parsing it correctly.
Next, I built into the parser, metric building. Count the unique users, count number of posts/menshns, count number of rooms/topics, etc.
From this I have the top line information:
Number of active users: 218
Number of active rooms: 224
Breaking this down further to “Top 20″ lists, I get:
20 Most prolific users: 5752 janemcqueen 3240 CosensV 2019 Chriss 2011 BlackAdder 1569 PoliticsBlogorguk 1520 Xlibris 1106 DavidX 783 JOSHBHJ 782 Louise 717 EdenFisher 704 JayMcNeil 666 Grist 588 TinderWall 401 RV 384 Bozier 373 jeanprytyskacz 348 MikeARPowell 285 Silaz 251 Rabbs 239 Europe
20 Busiest rooms: 6361 //ukpolitics 3216 //gaymarriage 1252 //religion 1014 //assangecase 877 //olympics2012 717 //judaism 673 //uselection 663 //atheism 642 //mormonism 585 //davidcameron 527 //civilliberty 479 //reshuffle 474 //mittromney 415 //corbyelectio 394 //capitalism 315 //twitter 295 //falklands 224 //louisemensch 208 //philosophy 204 //catholicism
Growth metrics are easily obtained by performing the same test at different times. In my case, they were 3.5 days apart. Leading to the conclusion posted on twitter:
— Paul Gregg (@pgregg) September 11, 2012
If you really want to see all the menshns, rather than overload the menshn server – you can obtain my parsed analysis of the dump at http://pgregg.com/test/menshn/menshnchat.txt
I’d welcome comments on this. For the record – none of this information was obtained via a “hack” and no illegal acts were committed in the gathering of this information.
Luke Bozier, co-founder of Menshn, has responded to my email from last night.
Unfortunately he has not retracted his allegation against me, nor offered an apology.
He has compounded the allegation by further alleging that he, and others, have seen me “bragging about setting up lukebozier.com”
He sent me a screen shot of the following tweet as “proof”.
— Disgruntled Mage (@tyndyll) July 22, 2012
Contents of the Email from Luke Bozier:
Subject: Re: http://lukebozier.com/ From: Luke Bozier <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Paul Gregg <email@example.com>
That would be all well and good except the fact that plenty of people have seen your Twitter bragging about setting up lukebozier.com on Twitter. See the attached screen shot. And it's not the only one.
Today in my twitter feed, I saw this:
— Luke Bozier (@Bozier) September 5, 2012
Now I know that the above is a fake/parody account, but it is funny to follow regardless. So I clicked on the link to see what it was about and was horrified to see Mr. Luke Bozier (the real one) make specific allegations that I am behind the lukebozer.com web site.
At the bottom of the page is:
Mr Luke Bozier is mistaken.
I have emailed Mr Luke Bozier asking for an apology and a retraction.
It is getting near that time of year when the world goes mad for the next revision of the iPhone.
That annual elation when the faithful can upgrade their awesome^H^H^H^H^H^H^H, sorry, now old and crappy iPhone 4S for the shiny new OMGOMGOMGOMG!!! NEW iPhone 5. And your life is complete.
On the other hand, there are those (I approximate, half the Apple citizens) who are mid-way through their 24 or 18 month contracts and are torn between needing that shiny new phone and buying out their contracts to get it, or having to suck it up and wait.
A few years ago, I would have agreed that the devices were getting exponentially better and there was a clear benefit to having the latest mobile device but I believe that is no longer true. The power of the devices are reaching a point where they can do almost anything you would want them to. Quad core CPUs – in your *phone*. I think the next huge leap will be in battery life, but, I digress.
Much like PC upgrade cycles. Businesses used to religiously replace their computers every 3 years. There was always a clear benefit to this and we all loved getting new computers because they were so much faster than the one before.
But that stopped being true* about 3 years ago (*unless you are a gamer). Word processing isn’t any faster, email isn’t faster, the Web isn’t faster. Generally speaking – the computer you bought 5 years ago is still pretty damn good.
Companies are realising this also and 3 year replacement cycles became 4 year replacement cycles mostly due to budget cuts. Then 4 years became 5 years as they noticed “hey, this still works great”. I believe the new standard PC replacement cycle will be 5 years. I think this was already true in the average home. As an aside, this business change is what is hurting the likes of Dell and HP right now.
So, back to our shiny mobile phones. Can this continue? I don’t believe so. There will come a time – and I think for Apple it will be 2013 – when the iPhone owners realise that their phone is still bloody awesome and the iPhone 6 isn’t such a great incremental step as before, and that maybe, just maybe, they don’t need this to complete their lives.
By 2015, I believe, I hope, that we will be happy with our devices and we won’t need to keep paying the annual upgrade tax just to have the latest shiny. The shiny in our pocket will be awesome, and it will remain so for a couple of years. We should be happy with our devices for at least 2 years – maybe 3.
We had a dotcom bubble. It burst in 2001. We had a financial bubble. It burst in 2008. We are in the middle of a mobile bubble. I believe it will burst in 2015.
None of the mobile device makers want this to happen. I’m not sure the phone companies would like it either – they still want to extract their £35 or $50 per month out of you for the next 24 months. But you, the consumer, the guy with the cash in his pocket, should care. You are paying £800 or $1200 every two years for that shiny slab of metal in your pocket. You probably wouldn’t spend that on your primary computer that could last 5 years.
Disclaimer, I use a 2.5 year old HTC Desire that is just begging to be upgraded – but I’m holding off as best I can to see what happens post iPhone 5 in the market. I aim to choose a phone that will last me 3 years. And if there can be any encouragement, it is this. I’m only paying £10 ($16) per month for all my minutes, texts and unlimited data plan.